A new unit means what to the common AP World student? “More comparisons on societies..” Do not fret, dear lad, because the new unit or, in Traditions & Encounters, “Part II” begins with giving you the overall comparisons of all of the classical societies.
A difference of the classical societies and the early complex societies was the legacies of the classical societies that endured long enough to influence billions of lives some of which can be seen today. Persia, China, India, and the Mediterranean basin were all involved in trading on (silk) roads or by sea. This interaction with one another formed a sort of alliance and a spread of diverse religions and cultural traditions. Some of the problems the societies faced were the administration of vast territories, military challenges, external and internal threats, factions, and the equitable distribution of land and wealth. Social classes formed as well as slaves who were being used for any area of work (some having more freedom than the other).
Starting off with the Persian Empire, I thought I had it easy, since I had knowledge of Cyrus, Darius, Persepolis and etc. But as always it seems that I know too little of the topic. For example, from 558-330 B.C.E., the Achaemenid Empire had a great impact on future administrations. The empire was divided into twenty-three satrapies which were administrative and taxation districts governed by satraps. Our government today has checks on each branch. Similarly, the military officers and tax collectors served as checks on the satraps’ power. To prevent satraps from rebelling and taking the land the rulers created audits, special spies that were the “eyes and ears of the king” who travelled with an army to do what is called now, oversight. Another beneficial contribution of the Achaemenid Empire was the courier system it formed that reminded me of the Pony Express. The Persian Royal Road and borrowing the idea of standardized coins fostered trade.
Like the Chinese, family and clan relationships influenced political and social affairs. What really helped Persia was its record keepers and translators. The Persians were cosmopolitan meaning they combined different parts of the world. For example, Persia did not change the rules of every land it conquered. Instead, it codified the laws of the subject peoples therefore accepting other cultures. I guess it is somewhat similar to America today in the sense that the entire area has common laws (national supremacy), the area is divided into fifty satrapies, are ruled by governmental bodies within the states (satraps), and all the different people can practice what they believe freely.
I was impressed to learn that the Persians made qanats which are underground canals that allowed cultivators to distribute water to fields without losing water to evaporation. Slaves were important for infrastructure and probably had a part in the formation of qanats.
When Mrs. Simonds announced that we could have a group quiz, it took the force of gravity and glue to make sure I did not fly off of my seat to receive the answers. I forced my bottom to stay seated and get my own answers from my notes before seeing what the others had. Thank you Mrs. Simonds, I am sure David is more grateful than I am. The Master Philosopher Kong Fuzi left the world with three values: ren- an attitude of kindness and benevolence or a sense of humanity, li- a sense of propriety, and xiao- filial piety. The goal of Confucianism led to the cultivation of personal morality, creation of junzi, and bringing order and stability to China. Confucianism’s flexibility led to longevity and influence in China.
The most prominent critics of Confucianism are Daoists. The founder of Daoism, Laozi, believes in doing nothing will accomplish everything. The doctrine of wuwei promotes the disengagement from the world, refrain from advanced education and personal striving, and to live simply in harmony with nature. I am sorry if what I am about to say offends you, but to help me remember Daoism, I thought of Laozi’s beliefs of life being “lousy.”
Legalism seemed to prove the most effective in maintaining order in China. It exemplified the military and agriculture. Harsh punishments, collective responsibility, and strict laws were main characteristics of legalism.
Although the Qin dynasty did not last as long as the Han, the Qin had standardized script, set a precedent by establishing a centralized imperial bureaucracy, and forming defensive walls. The Han dynasty infused Confucianist and Legalistic values that proved to coexist well for the time being. Already in my blog, I have compared many things to the American government. We were asked to answer, “What would all three philosophies look like in a government?” My answer was that it would look like the American government today, not taking much from the Daoists that is. We have a military, a political force that keeps people in line, education is a priority here, and we have a code of conduct like the Confucian values.
India is more confusing than Persia and China. I did not do well on the reading quiz only because I second-guessed my answers. Why does India have to name their children so similarly? Anyway India had regional kingdoms and imperial regimes, but they were not centralized. Chandragupta Maurya laid the foundation for the Mauryan Empire which was the first state to bring a centralized unified government to most of India. One can see the influence Persia had on India by India’s incorporation of spies in the bureaucratic administration system. Sea transportation of trade in the Indian Ocean Basin was based on the rhythms of the wind (monsoons).
India had a society based on the caste system. Religions such as Buddhism and Jainism attracted many people because they had a factor of not recognizing social hierarchies of castes and jaiti.
For Chapter 9 (India) we were given a choice to do notes using the outline or continuing to make our own notes. For me, the outline saves me so much time and writing and adds more insight than taking my own notes. It combines sections of the chapter and allows me to be as detailed as I am in my regular notes by having space on the margins to write in. The questions at the end are a challenge to answer, but I enjoy how it tests my comprehension of my reading. I also enjoy doing the handout with sequencing, quotations, and matching in groups. It helps organize the retained knowledge scattered in my noggin.